{"id":501,"date":"2013-06-17T13:01:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-17T13:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/?p=501"},"modified":"2020-01-29T15:33:05","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T15:33:05","slug":"reopening-rights-expanded-by-nevada-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/2013\/06\/articles\/reopening-rights\/reopening-rights-expanded-by-nevada-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Reopening Rights Expanded by Nevada Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;The Nevada Supreme Court published a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nevadajudiciary.us\/index.php\/advance-opinions\">decision<\/a> that is favorable for injured workers this month in <u>Williams v. United Parcel Services<\/u>, 129 Nev. Adv.Op. 41 (6\/6\/13). &nbsp;Two years after his back injury claim was closed, Williams, a UPS employee, asked to reopen his claim for more medical care. &nbsp;His reopening request was denied because he hadn&#8217;t been given a PPD award , and he hadn&#8217;t been off work long enough to get temporary total disability benefits. &nbsp;(Injured workers aren&#8217;t entitled to TTD benefits unless they are taken off work by the treating doctor for 5 days in a row, or&nbsp; 5 days in a 20-day period )<\/p>\n<p>A&nbsp;section of the &nbsp;reopening statute, NRS 616C.390(5) , states that an injured worker who is not off work as a result of the work injury, &nbsp;or who is not awarded a permanent partial disability (PPD) award when his claim is closed, cannot reopen his claim more than a year after the claim&nbsp;is closed.&nbsp;The actual language of the reopening statute says only that the injured worker must be off work as a result of the injury. &nbsp;However, this section of the law had always been interpreted by insurers, hearing officers and appeals officers to require&nbsp;that the injured worker show that he had had been off work long enough to receive benefits if the reopening request was made more than a year after claim closure. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Justice Nancy Saitta wrote in this recent published decision that there was nothing ambiguous about how the reopening law was written by the legislature. &nbsp;The plain meaning of the words &quot;off work&quot; meant that Williams only had to show that his doctor had taken him off work for the remainder of his shift due to his accident.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;This decision will help more injured workers who seek to have their claims reopened more than a year after their claims are closed.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;The Nevada Supreme Court published a decision that is favorable for injured workers this month in Williams v. United Parcel Services, 129 Nev. Adv.Op. 41 (6\/6\/13). &nbsp;Two years after his back injury claim was closed, Williams, a UPS employee, asked to reopen his claim for more medical care. &nbsp;His reopening request was denied because he &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/2013\/06\/articles\/reopening-rights\/reopening-rights-expanded-by-nevada-supreme-court\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Reopening Rights Expanded by Nevada Supreme Court<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[183,281,342,345,424,425,450,457],"class_list":["post-501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reopening-rights","tag-court","tag-interpretation","tag-nevada","tag-nevada-workers-compensation","tag-reopening","tag-reopening-rights","tag-statutory","tag-supreme"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1614,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions\/1614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}