{"id":326,"date":"2011-12-23T04:32:00","date_gmt":"2011-12-23T04:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/?p=326"},"modified":"2015-04-28T11:39:32","modified_gmt":"2015-04-28T11:39:32","slug":"nevada-workers-comp-fraud-you-dont-hear-about","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/2011\/12\/articles\/miscellaneous\/nevada-workers-comp-fraud-you-dont-hear-about\/","title":{"rendered":"Nevada Workers&#8217; Comp Fraud You Don&#8217;t Hear About"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nevadans&nbsp;have &nbsp;been convinced over the years&nbsp;that there are many workers who try to take advantage of the system, either by filing&nbsp;false claims or by prolonging their time off work, or&nbsp;by collecting undeserved permanent partial disability awards.&nbsp; &nbsp;What the&nbsp;public in Nevada&nbsp;rarely &nbsp;hears or reads about however, are the&nbsp;employers caught&nbsp;committing &nbsp;workers&#8217; compensation fraud, or the insurers who intentionally fail&nbsp;to pay legitimate&nbsp;claims. &nbsp; This type of fraud&nbsp;may be&nbsp;far more prevalent than&nbsp;fraud by employees.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In October, 2011,&nbsp;a national, non-profit group of mostly claimants&#8217; attorneys, the&nbsp;Workers Injury Law and Advocacy Group&nbsp; (WILG), published a paper entitled <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wilg.org\/temp\/ts_A9D990E8-A935-AB93-96CFCB5126B855D7A9D990F7-BADF-D6DB-875BB7F927BAF5CE\/Employer%20and%20Insurer%20Fraud-%20Boosting%20Bottom%20Line%20Profits%20at%20the%20Expense%20of%20Workers%20and%20Society.doc\">&quot;Employer and Insurer Fraud:&nbsp; Boosting Bottom Line profits at the&nbsp;Expense of Workers and Society&quot;<\/a>. &nbsp; The premise&nbsp;of the report is that workers&#8217; comp insurers and their administrators have&nbsp;successfully misinformed the&nbsp;public and elected lawmakers that&nbsp;employee fraud costs the insurance industry more money than employer or insurer fraud in uncollected taxes and uncollected premiums.&nbsp; &nbsp;WILG&nbsp;states that&nbsp;the insurance industry writes or funds most of the reports on workers&#8217; comp fraud, and therefore&nbsp;wants the public&nbsp;to believe that injured worker fraud is&nbsp;rampant.&nbsp;&nbsp;Insurers&nbsp;are able to charge&nbsp;higher premiums&nbsp; and advocate for legislative changes to reduce compensation benefits to injured workers&nbsp;if the public is convinced that injured workers&nbsp;are&nbsp;defrauding the system.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>WILG states that the actual statistics show that both employer and insurer fraud are a far greater problem, involving much larger sums of money, than fraud by injured workers .&nbsp;The statistics on the number of employers who are caught misclassifying employees to pay a lower premium or to avoid paying a premium at all are usually based on employer audits conducted by&nbsp;state agencies that oversee each state&#8217;s workers&#8217; compensation system. &nbsp; Less than 2% of Nevada employers were audited in Nevada in 2010 according the WILG&nbsp;report.<\/p>\n<p>In an effort to obtain unbiased information on whether employer or employee fraud is the greater problem in Nevada, I contacted Jennifer Lopez, Public Information Officer, of the Nevada Attorney General&#8217;s Office.&nbsp;&nbsp; I asked Ms. Lopez for figures on injured workers who were prosecuted for fraud, and statistics on employers who were prosecuted for under-reporting premiums or misclassifying employees. The Nevada Attorney General&#8217;s Office is statutorily responsible for prosecuting both injured worker fraud and employer fraud under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ms. Lopez explained that in order to prove injured worker fraud, it is more difficult for a prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the employee criminally intended to cheat the insurer or self-insured employer&nbsp;of undeserved benefits.&nbsp; For fiscal year 2011 (7\/1\/10 through 6\/30\/11), only 19 of the 93 cases that were investigated were prosecuted.&nbsp;In contrast, &nbsp;during fiscal year&nbsp;2011, the&nbsp;Nevada Attorney General&#8217;s&nbsp;Office opened 246 employer cases for investigation, and prosecuted 142 of those employers.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ms. Lopez noted that employer cases are usually misdemeanor offenses that involve less than $250 pertaining to employee misclassification or under-reporting of payroll.&nbsp; She emphasized &nbsp;that it is easier to prove&nbsp;employer fraud&nbsp;using the national insurance database information.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Ms. Lopez did not elaborate&nbsp;on how many employer cases involved misdemeanors versus felonies.<\/p>\n<p>Given the different standards of proof applicable to prosecuting employee fraud versus employer fraud,&nbsp; I&#8217;m not reaching any conclusions as to&nbsp;which type of fraud is the&nbsp;greater problem in Nevada&nbsp;based&nbsp;only&nbsp;on statistics from the Nevada A. G.&#8217;s &nbsp;Office on the the number of each&nbsp;cases&nbsp;prosecuted.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As I was gathering this information from the Nevada AG&#8217;s Office and looking at various reports from both insurance industry groups and injured worker advocacy groups, I read a recent&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wilg.org\/temp\/ts_A816656E-BDB9-505C-186DE3A834297676A816657D-BDB9-505C-1C1130549D4162C7\/Employer%20and%20Insurer%20Fraud-%20Boosting%20Bottom%20Line%20Profits%20at%20the%20Expense%20of%20Workers%20and%20Society.doc\">Fox News 5&nbsp;<\/a>&nbsp;article about the Nevada AG&#8217;s prosecution of a&nbsp;Maryland&nbsp;woman for workers&#8217; compensation fraud in Nevada.&nbsp;&nbsp; Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto was quoted as saying, &quot;Workers&#8217; compensation fraud is insidious.&nbsp; It quietly drives up the cost of coverage, a bill that nearly every employer in every sector will have to foot, &quot; said Attorney General Masto.&nbsp; &quot;My office will continue to aggressively prosecute these cases.&quot;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think the statistics from Attorney General Masto&#8217;s office support her comment that workers&#8217; compensation fraud in Nevada, at least by injured workers, is insidious.&nbsp; Over 58,000 claims were filed in fiscal year&nbsp;2009&nbsp;according to&nbsp;Nevada&#8217;s DIR Research and Analysis Supervisor, and the &nbsp;U.S. Bureau of Labor&#8217;s website shows that 42,300 Nevada claims were filed in fiscal year 2010.&nbsp; If less than 100 cases of possible fraud by employees are referred to the Nevada&nbsp;Attorney General&#8217;s Office each year, and less than 20% of those cases&nbsp;are prosecuted, I don&#8217;t know&nbsp;what information Ms. Masto was relying upon.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It makes for more interesting reading in the media to hear about someone getting caught red-handed on surveillance video faking an injury than it is to read about an employer not paying premiums on undocumented workers, &nbsp;or employers claiming that workers are independent contractors when they are really&nbsp;employees.&nbsp; I think it is unfortunate that we don&#8217;t have a true picture of the extent to which employee or employer fraud costs all Nevadans.&nbsp; Exaggerating what information we do have doesn&#8217;t help.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nevadans&nbsp;have &nbsp;been convinced over the years&nbsp;that there are many workers who try to take advantage of the system, either by filing&nbsp;false claims or by prolonging their time off work, or&nbsp;by collecting undeserved permanent partial disability awards.&nbsp; &nbsp;What the&nbsp;public in Nevada&nbsp;rarely &nbsp;hears or reads about however, are the&nbsp;employers caught&nbsp;committing &nbsp;workers&#8217; compensation fraud, or the insurers who &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/2011\/12\/articles\/miscellaneous\/nevada-workers-comp-fraud-you-dont-hear-about\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Nevada Workers&#8217; Comp Fraud You Don&#8217;t Hear About<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[28],"class_list":["post-326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous","tag-miscellaneous"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":327,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326\/revisions\/327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jhwlawoffice.com\/nevada-workers-comp-law-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}